Some businesses are attempting to shut down rooftop solar energy instead of combating climate change. To protect their business model from new technologies that could lower the demand for electricity in America’s oldest markets—where the majority of power plants are still in operation today—Florida Power & Light does precisely this.” In Florida, rooftop solar power generation is a growing industry that could reduce profits for electric companies. This new energy backbone could be detrimental to Florida Power & Light’s (FPL) current business model, which is based on selling fuel overheads like coal or natural gas plants do. FPL lobbied state lawmakers with records obtained by the Miami Herald and Floodlight for legislation they asked them to hand-deliver. Sen. Jennifer Bradley of the state of Florida, who sponsored Florida Power & Light’s top-priority bill in 2020, was a close ally. The bill would make it harder for businesses and homeowners across the nation who have installed rooftop solar panels to offset costs by forbidding them from selling excess power back onto the FPL grid at full retail price through a practice known as net metering. A bill drafted by the Florida Senate was forwarded to DLG Bradley in November for review. The FPL lobbyist drafted this legislation, and after observing how well-written our language was to keep up with the current events at every level of government, they gave $10K to her political advisory group! In fact, State Representative Lawrence McClure introduced his version exactly one month ago, sans any alterations. Less than 1% of Florida’s over 8 million customers—roughly 90,000—sell their excess energy back to utilities. This figure does not account for the thousands of people who are currently in line to install solar panels. But this has led to a major increase in rooftop solar installation in recent years, and Florida Power and Light—whose largest utility has 5.5 million customers (65%), followed by Duke Energy with 2 million, TECO with 800k, and numerous other smaller utility companies—is advocating legislation that could severely limit these gains. One more example of how utilities attempt to keep their monopoly on the electricity market is the opposition to net metering. Their argument that this bill will ruin the industry is unfounded, according to Will Giese, director of the Solar Energy Industries Association, who also notes that under the current regulations, consumers are still free to select the energy source that best suits their needs as long as they are satisfied with the options their provider provides. The Florida Public Service Commission has been receiving proposals from power companies on how they expect rooftop solar will affect their bottom line. According to one utility company, FPL, profits from this new technology known as “distributed renewable energy” could be threatened by $700 million between 2019 and 2025, meaning that they would have to make less money. However, scientists argue that we need these cleaner sources of electricity because of climate change. Chris McGrath, a representative for Florida Power and Light, stated that while the company is not opposed to net metering, it does think the current rule should be reviewed. He argued that customers with roofs facing the sun are supported by other customers who continue to have purchasing power and pay to maintain the power grid. “We basically accept roof sun oriented clients ought to pay the full expense of this venture,” McGrath said. A long, political fight The bill represents just one side of a protracted battle against the arrangement. Florida Power and Light has likely been the largest advocate of regulative Florida political missions for a considerable amount of time. In 2016, it moved a voting form correction that was bombed and allowed controllers to impose charges and boundaries on establishments that were roof-based and sunlight-based. Additionally, Florida Power and Light has contributed millions to groups that have anonymous, unidentified donors and launched attacks on local and state legislators. Florida Power and Light executives have been linked to a series of “dull cash” charities, as the Orlando Sentinel’s detailed information reveals. This particular charity is clearly mentioned in the Miami-Dade Express lawyer’s investigation into an outrage involving a “phantom” Senate candidate. As per the plan, a non-political candidate was included as a no-party option on the polling form in an attempt to confuse voters and reduce support for the Democratic candidate, helping the Republicans maintain their majority in the state Senate. The CEO of Florida Power and Light, Eric Silagy, was directly involved in allocating funds to shadowy investment groups led by the experts who oversaw Grow United, the organization that supported the apparition up-and-comers, according to documents obtained by the Sentinel. Holley, the lobbyist for Florida Power and Light who brought the net metering language to the Senate, tried to help Republican Senate hopefuls who were running in the adjacent races. Both Florida Power and Light refuted any inappropriate behavior related to political missions. In response to questions for this story, McGrath, a representative for Florida Power and Light, stated, “Any report or idea that we had an association in, monetarily upheld, or guided others to help any ‘apparition’ competitors during the 2020 political decision cycle is bogus, and we have tracked down no proof of any lawful bad behavior by FPL or its workers.” Additionally, Grow United and earlier initiatives to improve net metering are cross-over, according to records obtained by the Sentinel. One person who has partnered with Grow United is Abbie MacIver, a former employee of Energy Fairness, an organization that advocates for lawmakers to take into account the “cost of energy decisions, as well as their advantages.” In a letter to the Florida Public Service Commission’s state controllers last year, McClure mentioned the results and requested that the commission update its net-metering regulation. After the commission hosted a studio, proponents of solar energy sent 16,000 messages pleading with it to approve the net metering program. According to officials, it was the fastest